Financial Regulators of New Zealand and Sweden Issued Statements Regarding ICOs

Source : Financial Regulators of New Zealand and Sweden Issued Statements Regarding ICOs The respective financial regulators for Sweden and New Zealand have recently issued statements addressing initial coin offerings (ICOs).  Also Read: Sweden Latest Government to Auction Bitcoins, Turns Tidy Profit Sweden’s Financial Supervisory Authority [FSA] Has Issued a Statement Warning of the Risks Associated With ICOs Sweden’s financial regulator has issued a statement outlining a number of risks pertaining to ICOs. The document describes “ICO” as a “term used as the designation for launching a new token or other form of digital access based on… crypto.” The FSA compares initial coins offerings to “grassroots” financing activities, stating “the purpose of an ICO is to raise funding from the public to develop a business idea for a completed business, not different from grassroots financing.” The FSA’s document highlights five areas of principle concern: “No Rights” – The FSA states that “most ICOs are unregulated,” and as such are “not under the supervision of… authorities. As a consequence resulting lack of “consumer protections,” the FSA warns that there is “ no guarantee that the token or cryptocurrency launched really gives the proprietor any kind of right or claim against the publisher.” “No Market Valuation” – The FSA states that “there is usually no requirement that the price… [of] a new digital asset is matched by a true market value,” and that the issuer “has no obligation to allow any independent party to evaluate the digital asset.” “No Guaranteed Access to Secondary Market” – The FSA warns that there is “no requirement that… someone… will buy back the digital asset” once it is distributed. “No Information Requirements” – The FSA emphasized the lack “requirement for anyone launching an ICO to provide all essential information,” nor that said information is “provided to all investors at the same time.” “Risk of Investment Fraud” – The FSA warns that “the recent rapid increase in both the number of ICOs and their value can attract [developers] who have no interest in completing any project but are just looking for… money.” New Zealand’s Financial Regulator Recently Addressed ICOs New Zealand’s Financial Markets Authority recently issued a statement that seeks to encourage entities within the ICO and cryptocurrency industries to consult with the regulatory body regarding their legal obligations. The FMA “strongly encourages any businesses considering making an offer through an ICO to approach us early during their development phase.” The regulator asserts that the “specific characteristics and economic substance of an ICO determine if it’s a financial product – if it is regulated, and if so how.” The FMA also has released guides for individuals and businesses seeking to offer “services such as cryptocurrency exchanges, wallets and brokering.” Such providers must “be a member of a dispute resolution scheme, be on the Financial Services Providers Register, must comply with fair dealing provisions in the Financial Markets Conduct Act. The FMA states that it “wants to facilitate responsible innovation, and ensure that the regulatory regime remains relevant and …

Plus…Financial Regulators of New Zealand and Sweden Issued Statements Regarding ICOs

New Zealand’s Financial Regulator states all Cryptocurrencies are Securities

Source : New Zealand’s Financial Regulator states all Cryptocurrencies are Securities Not long ago, the New Zealand Financial Markets Authority, also known as the FMA, has published a commentary about initial coin offerings (ICOs) and digital currency services. In its statements, the financial regulator declared that the economic substance alongside with a few characteristics can determine whether an ICO is a financial product or not. The report goes ahead and explains how ICOs can actually fall under the scope of managed investment products, debt securities, derivatives, equity securities and more, therefore companies holding these crowdfunding campaigns may have to fulfill certain regulatory requirements. All tokens and digital currencies are securities The agency went ahead and clarified that: “All tokens or cryptocurrencies are securities under the FMC Act [Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013] – even those that are not financial products. A security is any arrangement or facility that has, or is intended to have, the effect of a person making an investment or managing a financial risk.”  Not only this, but the regulator also mentioned that all businesses offering financial services related to digital currencies, such as wallets, brokers, and exchanges need to comply with the Financial Service Providers Act of 2008. In case a digital currency is not defined as a financial product, then businesses will need to comply with trade regulations, as per the Fair Trading Act. The FMA also commented that at this time, most of the online exchanges operating in the region have no licenses and aren’t regulated, therefore if something goes wrong, investors will not be able to legally recover their investment capital. However, these statements lead us to believe that New Zealand is not actually planning to work on any legislative framework for digital currencies and the related services anytime soon. Rather, some believe that the FMA wishes to inform the public that they take no responsibility whatsoever in case things go wrong. Based on these aspects, what are your thoughts on the New Zealand FMA statements? Let us know in the comments.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!